Hi, all,
I've attached my image with this mail. I was just
struggling for the soft shadows. This is my parameters for rpict:
rpict -vf default.vp -ps 1 -aa .08 -ab 2 -ad 512 -as 256 -ar 128
-dj .6 -ds .1 -x 12288 -y 9216 scene.oct > scene.pic
I made such a large image to get 12 times oversample. I then filter
it down. This is for pfilt:
pfilt -e .4 -r .7 -x 1024 -y 768 scene.pic > scene_filt.pic
Even so, I still get the image like that. I'm really confused. How
to get a satisfying result?
cheers,
Alex
Try
rpict ... -ds .05 -dj .2 or 0.15 -ar 5000 -ps 1 -ad 512 -as 256
Martin Moeck
···
-----Original Message-----
From: alex wang [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thu 12/2/2004 1:45 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc:
Subject: [Radiance-general] soft shadows!
Hi, all,
I've attached my image with this mail. I was just
struggling for the soft shadows. This is my parameters for rpict:
rpict -vf default.vp -ps 1 -aa .08 -ab 2 -ad 512 -as 256 -ar 128
-dj .6 -ds .1 -x 12288 -y 9216 scene.oct > scene.pic
I made such a large image to get 12 times oversample. I then filter
it down. This is for pfilt:
pfilt -e .4 -r .7 -x 1024 -y 768 scene.pic > scene_filt.pic
Even so, I still get the image like that. I'm really confused. How
to get a satisfying result?
cheers,
Alex
I was going to suggest -dj 0.9 and compile with the -DMC option.
M
···
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, alex wang wrote:
Hi, all,
I've attached my image with this mail. I was just
struggling for the soft shadows. This is my parameters for rpict:
rpict -vf default.vp -ps 1 -aa .08 -ab 2 -ad 512 -as 256 -ar 128
-dj .6 -ds .1 -x 12288 -y 9216 scene.oct > scene.pic
I made such a large image to get 12 times oversample. I then filter
it down. This is for pfilt:
pfilt -e .4 -r .7 -x 1024 -y 768 scene.pic > scene_filt.pic
Even so, I still get the image like that. I'm really confused. How
to get a satisfying result?
cheers,
Alex
You shouldn't be seeing these lines. I expect the -dj .6 combined with -ds .1 are causing aiming failures that are resulting in these weird arguments. I concur with Mark's suggestion, though the -DMC recompilation is a bit drastic. You might simply try -ds .4 -dj .4 first to see if that fixes it.
-Greg
···
From: Mark Stock <[email protected]>
Date: December 2, 2004 11:53:19 AM PST
I was going to suggest -dj 0.9 and compile with the -DMC option.
M
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, alex wang wrote:
Hi, all,
I've attached my image with this mail. I was just
struggling for the soft shadows. This is my parameters for rpict:
rpict -vf default.vp -ps 1 -aa .08 -ab 2 -ad 512 -as 256 -ar 128
-dj .6 -ds .1 -x 12288 -y 9216 scene.oct > scene.pic
I made such a large image to get 12 times oversample. I then filter
it down. This is for pfilt:
pfilt -e .4 -r .7 -x 1024 -y 768 scene.pic > scene_filt.pic
Even so, I still get the image like that. I'm really confused. How
to get a satisfying result?
cheers,
Alex
