I am running simulations of Blinds in a small office room. I am trying to get glare values for my viewpoints. While running the findglare program I get the following segmentation fault
Can you please give details on the operating system, system
architecture, and the release and source of the findglare you used? That
will make it easier to track problems.
Thanx for the prompt reply. I am Using Mac OSX. I have installed Radiance version 3.9.
I am not from a Computer Science background so excuse me for lack of knowledge about this but I did not exactly get what you meant by release and source of findglare..!!
Thank you again.
···
On Wed Oct 15 10:49:43 EDT 2008, "Lars O. Grobe" <grobe@gmx.net> wrote:
Can you please give details on the operating system, system
architecture, and the release and source of the findglare you used? That
will make it easier to track problems.
yep, same on macosx/intel here...
the solution?use the PPC intel binaries...
I guess there is a bug somewhere and the intel processors do not like it.
funnily enough the old PPCs are ok
Greg?
G
···
On 15 Oct 2008, at 20:59, G V DEEPAK wrote:
Hello Dr Grobe,
Thanx for the prompt reply. I am Using Mac OSX. I have installed Radiance version 3.9.
I am not from a Computer Science background so excuse me for lack of knowledge about this but I did not exactly get what you meant by release and source of findglare..!!
Thank you again.
On Wed Oct 15 10:49:43 EDT 2008, "Lars O. Grobe" <grobe@gmx.net> > wrote:
Must be a pointer or byte-order issue. I'll have to look into it when I get back from Japan next week. Luckily, I have a MacBook I can experiment with at home.
-Greg
···
From: giulio <antonutto@yahoo.it>
Date: October 16, 2008 6:11:05 AM JST
yep, same on macosx/intel here...
the solution?use the PPC intel binaries...
I guess there is a bug somewhere and the intel processors do not like it.
funnily enough the old PPCs are ok
Greg?
G
On 15 Oct 2008, at 20:59, G V DEEPAK wrote:
Hello Dr Grobe,
Thanx for the prompt reply. I am Using Mac OSX. I have installed Radiance version 3.9.
I am not from a Computer Science background so excuse me for lack of knowledge about this but I did not exactly get what you meant by release and source of findglare..!!
Thank you again.
On Wed Oct 15 10:49:43 EDT 2008, "Lars O. Grobe" <grobe@gmx.net> >> wrote:
Can you please give details on the operating system, system
architecture, and the release and source of the findglare you used? That
will make it easier to track problems.
CU Lars.
Must be a pointer or byte-order issue. I'll have to look into it when I get back from Japan next week. Luckily, I have a MacBook I can experiment with at home.
-Greg
From: giulio <antonutto@yahoo.it>
Date: October 16, 2008 6:11:05 AM JST
yep, same on macosx/intel here...
the solution?use the PPC intel binaries...
I guess there is a bug somewhere and the intel processors do not like it.
funnily enough the old PPCs are ok
Greg?
G
On 15 Oct 2008, at 20:59, G V DEEPAK wrote:
Hello Dr Grobe,
Thanx for the prompt reply. I am Using Mac OSX. I have installed Radiance version 3.9.
I am not from a Computer Science background so excuse me for lack of knowledge about this but I did not exactly get what you meant by release and source of findglare..!!
Thank you again.
On Wed Oct 15 10:49:43 EDT 2008, "Lars O. Grobe" >>> <grobe@gmx.net> wrote:
Can you please give details on the operating system, system
architecture, and the release and source of the findglare you used? That
will make it easier to track problems.
CU Lars.
Must be a pointer or byte-order issue. I'll have to look into it when I get back from Japan next week. Luckily, I have a MacBook I can experiment with at home.
-Greg
From: giulio <antonutto@yahoo.it>
Date: October 16, 2008 6:11:05 AM JST
yep, same on macosx/intel here...
the solution?use the PPC intel binaries...
I guess there is a bug somewhere and the intel processors do not like it.
funnily enough the old PPCs are ok
Greg?
G
On 15 Oct 2008, at 20:59, G V DEEPAK wrote:
Hello Dr Grobe,
Thanx for the prompt reply. I am Using Mac OSX. I have installed Radiance version 3.9.
I am not from a Computer Science background so excuse me for lack of knowledge about this but I did not exactly get what you meant by release and source of findglare..!!
Thank you again.
On Wed Oct 15 10:49:43 EDT 2008, "Lars O. Grobe" >>> <grobe@gmx.net> wrote:
Can you please give details on the operating system, system
architecture, and the release and source of the findglare you used? That
will make it easier to track problems.
CU Lars.
Hi -- glad it works. Yes, you may calculate glare index values at specific points, corresponding to eye positions. The "glare" script should help you with that.
Best,
-Greg
···
From: G V DEEPAK <deepak.gv@ufl.edu>
Date: October 28, 2008 1:55:44 PM GMT+01:00
Thank you so much Dr Ward, This works..
I would like to know If it is possible to find Glare Index Values at specific point coordinates, like the way we calculate Illuminance values...?
Thanks again..
On Sat Oct 25 01:48:03 EDT 2008, Greg Ward <gregoryjward@gmail.com> > wrote:
Use the attached version of findglare, instead. It's recompiled from 3.9 sources.
-Greg